[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] process/release: mention MAINTAINER adjustments
Hi Jan, On 20/03/2025 13:45, Jan Beulich wrote: On 20.03.2025 13:47, Andrew Cooper wrote:On 20/03/2025 12:12 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:For many major releases I've been updating ./MAINTAINERS _after_ the respective branch was handed over to me. That update, however, is relevant not only from the .1 minor release onwards, but right from the .0 release. Hence it ought to be done as one of the last things before tagging the tree for the new major release. See the seemingly unrelated parts (as far as the commit subject goes) of e.g. 9d465658b405 ("update Xen version to 4.20.1-pre") for an example. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- As can also be seen from the referenced commit, the document already saying "drop any references to the specific commits, e.g. date or title" hasn't been honored in recent releases, at least as far as QEMU_TRADITIONAL_REVISION goes.Oh, lovely. I wasn't even aware there was a necessary change like this. Also, I haven't made as much progress rewriting the checklist as I would have liked, so it is probably best to insert into this doc for now. The qemu-trad comments I think we can just strip out of staging. We don't have equivalent comments for the other trees.Right, I was wondering what else might be stale there. There are a few more things [1] that are still waiting for a review... I think there might be other from Andrew as well which needs to be respinned/committed. Although, I don't think we had one for QEMU trad. Cheers, [1] https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20241206194025.31662-3-julien@xxxxxxx/ -- Julien Grall
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |