[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] iommu/arm: Introduce iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids API
On 14.03.2025 14:34, Mykyta Poturai wrote: > From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx> > > The main purpose of this patch is to add a way to register PCI device > (which is behind the IOMMU) using the generic PCI-IOMMU DT bindings [1] > before assigning that device to a domain. > > This behaves similarly to the existing iommu_add_dt_device API, except it > handles PCI devices, and it is to be invoked from the add_device hook in the > SMMU driver. > > The function dt_map_id to translate an ID through a downstream mapping > (which is also suitable for mapping Requester ID) was borrowed from Linux > (v5.10-rc6) and updated according to the Xen code base. > > [1] > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-iommu.txt > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Mykyta Poturai <mykyta_poturai@xxxxxxxx> > --- > Regarding pci_for_each_dma_alias question: getting host bridge node > directly seems like a simpler solution with the same result. AFAIU > with pci_for_each_dma_alias in linux we would arrive to the host brige > node anyway, but also try to call dt_map_id for each device along the > way. I am not sure why exactly it is done this way in linux, as > according to the pci-iommu.txt, iommu-map node can only be present in > the PCI root. > > v8->v9: > * replace DT_NO_IOMMU with 1 > * guard iommu_add_pci_sideband_ids with CONFIG_ARM I fear I'm confused: Isn't this contradicting ... > v7->v8: > * ENOSYS->EOPNOTSUPP > * move iommu_add_pci_sideband_ids to iommu.c to fix x86 build ... this earlier change? Really, with there being no caller, I can't see why there could be any build issue here affecting only x86. Except for Misra complaining about unreachable code being introduced, which I'm sure I said before should be avoided. > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ > #include <xen/param.h> > #include <xen/softirq.h> > #include <xen/keyhandler.h> > +#include <xen/acpi.h> > #include <xsm/xsm.h> > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86 > @@ -744,6 +745,20 @@ int __init > iommu_get_extra_reserved_device_memory(iommu_grdm_t *func, > return 0; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM I realize we have CONFIG_X86 here as well (visible even in context of the earlier hunk. Yet then the goal ought to be to reduce these anomalies, not add new ones. Since I don't have a clear picture of what's wanted, I'm also in trouble suggesting any alternative, I'm afraid. > +int iommu_add_pci_sideband_ids(struct pci_dev *pdev) > +{ > + int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI > + if ( acpi_disabled ) > + ret = iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids(pdev); > +#endif > + > + return ret; > +} > +#endif > + > /* > * Local variables: > * mode: C Having reached the end of the changes to this file, it's also not quite clear why xen/acpi.h would need including uniformly. Can't this live inside the outer #ifdef? Further, since #ifdef-ary is used here already anyway, why ... > @@ -238,8 +252,32 @@ int iommu_do_dt_domctl(struct xen_domctl *domctl, struct > domain *d, > */ > int iommu_remove_dt_device(struct dt_device_node *np); > > +#else /* !HAS_DEVICE_TREE */ > +static inline int iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids(struct pci_dev *pdev) > +{ > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > +} > + > #endif /* HAS_DEVICE_TREE */ ... resort to a stub when the inner #ifdef could simple be extended? Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |