[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] iommu/arm: Introduce iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids API


  • To: Mykyta Poturai <Mykyta_Poturai@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:56:47 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <Oleksandr_Tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:56:58 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 14.03.2025 14:34, Mykyta Poturai wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> The main purpose of this patch is to add a way to register PCI device
> (which is behind the IOMMU) using the generic PCI-IOMMU DT bindings [1]
> before assigning that device to a domain.
> 
> This behaves similarly to the existing iommu_add_dt_device API, except it
> handles PCI devices, and it is to be invoked from the add_device hook in the
> SMMU driver.
> 
> The function dt_map_id to translate an ID through a downstream mapping
> (which is also suitable for mapping Requester ID) was borrowed from Linux
> (v5.10-rc6) and updated according to the Xen code base.
> 
> [1] 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-iommu.txt
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mykyta Poturai <mykyta_poturai@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Regarding pci_for_each_dma_alias question: getting host bridge node
> directly seems like a simpler solution with the same result. AFAIU
> with pci_for_each_dma_alias in linux we would arrive to the host brige
> node anyway, but also try to call dt_map_id for each device along the
> way. I am not sure why exactly it is done this way in linux, as
> according to the pci-iommu.txt, iommu-map node can only be present in
> the PCI root.
> 
> v8->v9:
> * replace DT_NO_IOMMU with 1
> * guard iommu_add_pci_sideband_ids with CONFIG_ARM

I fear I'm confused: Isn't this contradicting ...

> v7->v8:
> * ENOSYS->EOPNOTSUPP
> * move iommu_add_pci_sideband_ids to iommu.c to fix x86 build

... this earlier change? Really, with there being no caller, I can't see
why there could be any build issue here affecting only x86. Except for
Misra complaining about unreachable code being introduced, which I'm sure
I said before should be avoided.

> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include <xen/param.h>
>  #include <xen/softirq.h>
>  #include <xen/keyhandler.h>
> +#include <xen/acpi.h>
>  #include <xsm/xsm.h>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> @@ -744,6 +745,20 @@ int __init 
> iommu_get_extra_reserved_device_memory(iommu_grdm_t *func,
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM

I realize we have CONFIG_X86 here as well (visible even in context of the
earlier hunk. Yet then the goal ought to be to reduce these anomalies, not
add new ones. Since I don't have a clear picture of what's wanted, I'm also
in trouble suggesting any alternative, I'm afraid.

> +int iommu_add_pci_sideband_ids(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +    int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI
> +    if ( acpi_disabled )
> +        ret = iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids(pdev);
> +#endif
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * Local variables:
>   * mode: C

Having reached the end of the changes to this file, it's also not quite clear
why xen/acpi.h would need including uniformly. Can't this live inside the
outer #ifdef?

Further, since #ifdef-ary is used here already anyway, why ...

> @@ -238,8 +252,32 @@ int iommu_do_dt_domctl(struct xen_domctl *domctl, struct 
> domain *d,
>   */
>  int iommu_remove_dt_device(struct dt_device_node *np);
>  
> +#else /* !HAS_DEVICE_TREE */
> +static inline int iommu_add_dt_pci_sideband_ids(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +    return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* HAS_DEVICE_TREE */

... resort to a stub when the inner #ifdef could simple be extended?

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.