[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 04/23] xen/arm: dom0less use domid 0 for hwdom
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025, Julien Grall wrote: > > init-dom0less only initializes non- introduced domains, so hwdom doesn't get > > its "domid" xenstore node populated. That leads to other errors. > > > So I think with Denis's patch, this isn't strictly needed. It does help > > existing toolstack code work today. > > I don't think the toolstack is ready for a split between control/hardware > domain. That said, shouldn't the toolstack run in the control domain? Same for > xenstored (unless you have a xenstored domain)? Yes, the toolstack (if present) would be in the control domain. xenstored doesn't have to be in the control domain and in fact it might not be advisable to place it there today. The main difference between the toolstack and xenstored is that the toolstack only talks to Xen, while xenstored talks to all other VMs, which is dangerous in many configurations.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |