Re: [PATCH] xen: Update minimum toolchain requirements

[Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2025-03-07 19:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 07/03/2025 6:22 pm, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> > On 2025-03-07 18:54, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > and these too, but will require MISRA adjustments:
> > >
> > >  * _Generic() to make properly const-preserving wrappers
> > Perhaps stating something that is already well-known, but this
> > effectively means moving from MISRA C:2012 Amendment 2 as a target to,
> > at least, MISRA C:2012 Amendment 3, as that version contains rules in
> > series 23 for _Generic.
> Yes, I was expecting something along these lines.  It's also why I 
> don't
> suggest we start using it immediately.  (There's *loads* of non-MISRA
> related work to do when these changes get accepted.)
>
>
> Part of the justification for doing the MISRA work upstream was so it
> could stay "clean" on an ongoing basis.  The corollary to this is that
> our choice of MISRA standard needs to adapt as upstream Xen changes.
>
>
> Do you have any insight on how disruptive this would be?  I presume 
> it's
> not as simple as running sed over our docs and Eclair config, but I 
> also
> don't imagine it's a giant task either.
Yes, indeed. I needs a global re-evaluation due to new rules being 
introduced (e.g. _Noreturn handling gets its own rules in Amendment 3) 
so those would need to be discussed in-depth, but the impact is probably 
not dramatic overall in terms of configuration changes, as most of the 
rules are unchanged.
> ~Andrew
--
Nicola Vetrini, B.Sc.
Software Engineer
BUGSENG (https://bugseng.com)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicola-vetrini-a42471253