[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] xen/pciback: Make missing GSI non-fatal
- To: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 09:23:35 +0100
- Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
- Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>, Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 08:23:47 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 26.02.2025 21:01, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> A PCI may not have a legacy IRQ. In that case, do not fail assigning
Nit: Missing "device".
> to the pciback stub. Instead just skip xen_pvh_setup_gsi().
>
> This will leave psdev->gsi == -1. In that case, when reading the value
> via IOCTL_PRIVCMD_PCIDEV_GET_GSI, return -ENOENT. Userspace can used
Nit: "use".
> this to distinquish from other errors.
Nit: "distinguish".
> --- a/drivers/xen/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/acpi.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ int xen_acpi_get_gsi_info(struct pci_dev *dev,
>
> pin = dev->pin;
> if (!pin)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -ENOENT;
>
> entry = acpi_pci_irq_lookup(dev, pin);
> if (entry) {
While I can understand this change, ...
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ int xen_acpi_get_gsi_info(struct pci_dev *dev,
> gsi = -1;
>
> if (gsi < 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -ENOENT;
>
> *gsi_out = gsi;
> *trigger_out = trigger;
... I'd expect this needs to keep using an error code other than ENOENT.
Aiui this path means the device has a pin-based interrupt, just that it's
not configured correctly. In which case we'd better not allow the device
to be handed to a guest. Unless there's logic in place (somewhere) to
make sure it then would get to see a device without pin-based interrupt.
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> @@ -240,6 +240,9 @@ static int pcistub_get_gsi_from_sbdf(unsigned int sbdf)
> if (!psdev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + if (psdev->gsi == -1)
> + return -ENOENT;
This may, aiui, mean either of the two situations above. They would then
need distinguishing, too, if user space is intended to derive decisions
from the error code it gets.
Jan
|