[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] x86/cpufreq: add "cpufreq=amd-cppc,active" para


  • To: Penny Zheng <Penny.Zheng@xxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 16:52:36 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Ray.Huang@xxxxxxx, Jason.Andryuk@xxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:52:46 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 06.02.2025 09:32, Penny Zheng wrote:
> --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc
> +++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc
> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ If set, force use of the performance counters for 
> oprofile, rather than detectin
>  available support.
>  
>  ### cpufreq
> -> `= none | {{ <boolean> | xen } { 
> [:[powersave|performance|ondemand|userspace][,[<maxfreq>]][,[<minfreq>]]] } 
> [,verbose]} | dom0-kernel | hwp[:[<hdc>][,verbose]] | amd-cppc[:[verbose]]`
> +> `= none | {{ <boolean> | xen } { 
> [:[powersave|performance|ondemand|userspace][,[<maxfreq>]][,[<minfreq>]]] } 
> [,verbose]} | dom0-kernel | hwp[:[<hdc>][,verbose]] | 
> amd-cppc[:[active][,verbose]]`
>  
>  > Default: `xen`
>  
> @@ -538,6 +538,12 @@ choice of `dom0-kernel` is deprecated and not supported 
> by all Dom0 kernels.
>    on supported AMD hardware to provide finer grained frequency control 
> mechanism.
>    The default is disabled. If `amd-cppc` is selected, but hardware support
>    is not available, Xen will fallback to cpufreq=xen.
> +* `active` is a boolean to enable amd-cppc driver in active(autonomous) mode.
> +  In this mode, users could provide a hint with energy performance preference
> +  register to the hardware if they want to bias toward performance(0x0) or
> +  energy efficiency(0xff), then CPPC power algorithm will calculate the 
> runtime
> +  workload and adjust the realtime cores frequency according to the power 
> supply
> +  and thermal, core voltage and some other hardware conditions.

All the option offers to the user is a boolean. The description wants to be
written based on that; to be honest, with what is there and with the new
variable not actually consumed anywhere, I have no real idea what this is
about. Hex numbers in particular don't belong here at all, imo. And "users
could provide a hint" needs to be more practical: Users don't directly write
to the "energy performance preference register" (or any other one).

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/amd-cppc.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/amd-cppc.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
>  #define amd_cppc_warn(fmt, args...)                         \
>      printk(XENLOG_WARNING "AMD_CPPC: CPU%u warning: " fmt, cpu, ## args)
>  
> +static bool __ro_after_init opt_cpufreq_active;

The name is ambiguous. It reads as if this was a global enable/disable for
the cpufreq subsystem. opt_active_mode perhaps, seeing this is local to
the CPPC driver?

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.