[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH 1/4] xen/arm: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.1
Hi, On 18/10/2023 15:18, Simone Ballarin wrote: Rule 13.1: Initializer lists shall not contain persistent side effects This patch moves expressions with side-effects into new variables before the initializer lists. Looking at the code, I feel the commit message should be a bit more verbose because they are no apparent side-effects. Function calls do not necessarily have side-effects, in these cases the GCC pure or const attributes are added when possible. You are only adding pure in this patch. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Function attributes pure and const do not need to be added as GCC attributes, they can be added using ECLAIR configurations. --- xen/arch/arm/device.c | 6 +++--- xen/arch/arm/guestcopy.c | 12 ++++++++---- xen/arch/arm/include/asm/current.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/device.c b/xen/arch/arm/device.c index 1f631d3274..e9be078415 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/device.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/device.c @@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ int handle_device(struct domain *d, struct dt_device_node *dev, p2m_type_t p2mt, int res; paddr_t addr, size; bool own_device = !dt_device_for_passthrough(dev); + bool dev_is_hostbridge = is_pci_passthrough_enabled() && + device_get_class(dev) == DEVICE_PCI_HOSTBRIDGE; The commit message suggests that the code is moved because there are side-effects. But none of them should have any side-effects. In fact, if I am not mistaken, both is_pci_passthrough_enabled() and device_get_class() could be marked as pure. /* * We want to avoid mapping the MMIO in dom0 for the following cases: * - The device is owned by dom0 (i.e. it has been flagged for @@ -329,9 +331,7 @@ int handle_device(struct domain *d, struct dt_device_node *dev, p2m_type_t p2mt, struct map_range_data mr_data = { .d = d, .p2mt = p2mt, - .skip_mapping = !own_device || - (is_pci_passthrough_enabled() && - (device_get_class(dev) == DEVICE_PCI_HOSTBRIDGE)), + .skip_mapping = !own_device || dev_is_hostbridge, .iomem_ranges = iomem_ranges, .irq_ranges = irq_ranges }; diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/guestcopy.c b/xen/arch/arm/guestcopy.c index 6716b03561..3ec6743bf6 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/guestcopy.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/guestcopy.c @@ -109,27 +109,31 @@ static unsigned long copy_guest(void *buf, uint64_t addr, unsigned int len,unsigned long raw_copy_to_guest(void *to, const void *from, unsigned int len){ + struct vcpu *current_vcpu = current; It is not clear to me what is the perceived side effect here and the others below. Can you clarify? return copy_guest((void *)from, (vaddr_t)to, len, - GVA_INFO(current), COPY_to_guest | COPY_linear); + GVA_INFO(current_vcpu), COPY_to_guest | COPY_linear); }unsigned long raw_copy_to_guest_flush_dcache(void *to, const void *from,unsigned int len) { - return copy_guest((void *)from, (vaddr_t)to, len, GVA_INFO(current), + struct vcpu *current_vcpu = current; + return copy_guest((void *)from, (vaddr_t)to, len, GVA_INFO(current_vcpu), COPY_to_guest | COPY_flush_dcache | COPY_linear); }unsigned long raw_clear_guest(void *to, unsigned int len){ - return copy_guest(NULL, (vaddr_t)to, len, GVA_INFO(current), + struct vcpu *current_vcpu = current; + return copy_guest(NULL, (vaddr_t)to, len, GVA_INFO(current_vcpu), COPY_to_guest | COPY_linear); }unsigned long raw_copy_from_guest(void *to, const void __user *from,unsigned int len) { - return copy_guest(to, (vaddr_t)from, len, GVA_INFO(current), + struct vcpu *current_vcpu = current; + return copy_guest(to, (vaddr_t)from, len, GVA_INFO(current_vcpu), COPY_from_guest | COPY_linear); }diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/current.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/current.hindex 6973eeb1d1..a66e28fefb 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/current.h +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/current.h @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct cpu_info { uint32_t flags; };-static inline struct cpu_info *get_cpu_info(void)+static inline __attribute_pure__ struct cpu_info *get_cpu_info(void) { #ifdef __clang__ unsigned long sp; Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |