[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN PATCH][for-4.19 v2 2/8] arm/bitops: encapsulate violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1

To: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 16:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, xenia.ragiadakou@xxxxxxx, ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, jbeulich@xxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 23:32:03 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> The definitions of ffs{l}? violate Rule 10.1, by using the well-known
> pattern (x & -x); its usage is wrapped by the LOWEST_BIT macro.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [XEN PATCH v2 0/8] address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1
  - From: Nicola Vetrini
- [XEN PATCH][for-4.19 v2 2/8] arm/bitops: encapsulate violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1
  - From: Nicola Vetrini

Prev by Date: Re: [XEN PATCH][for-next][for-4.19 v2 1/8] xen/include: add macro LOWEST_BIT
Next by Date: Re: [XEN PATCH][for-4.19 v2 3/8] xen/pdx: amend definition of PDX_GROUP_COUNT
Previous by thread: [XEN PATCH][for-4.19 v2 2/8] arm/bitops: encapsulate violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1
Next by thread: [XEN PATCH][for-4.19 v2 3/8] xen/pdx: amend definition of PDX_GROUP_COUNT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.