[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] domain: fix misaligned unmap address in unmap_guest_area()
Hi Roger,
On 06/10/2023 10:13, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
unmap_domain_page_global() expects the provided address to be page aligned, or
else some of the called functions will trigger assertions, like
modify_xen_mappings() on x86 or destroy_xen_mappings() on Arm.
The following assert has been reported by osstest arm 32bit tests:
(XEN) Assertion 'IS_ALIGNED(s, PAGE_SIZE)' failed at arch/arm/mm.c:1243
(XEN) ----[ Xen-4.18-rc arm32 debug=y Not tainted ]----
(XEN) CPU: 0
(XEN) PC: 00271a38 destroy_xen_mappings+0x50/0x5c
[...]
(XEN) Xen call trace:
(XEN) [<00271a38>] destroy_xen_mappings+0x50/0x5c (PC)
(XEN) [<00235aa8>] vunmap+0x30/0x1a0 (LR)
(XEN) [<0026ad88>] unmap_domain_page_global+0x10/0x20
(XEN) [<00208e38>] unmap_guest_area+0x90/0xec
(XEN) [<00208f98>] domain_kill+0x104/0x180
(XEN) [<00239e3c>] do_domctl+0x8ac/0x14fc
(XEN) [<0027ae34>] do_trap_guest_sync+0x570/0x66c
(XEN) [<002019f0>] arch/arm/arm32/entry.o#return_from_trap+0/0x4
Fixes: eadc288cbb0d ('domain: map/unmap GADDR based shared guest areas')
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
unmap_domain_page_global() and vunmap() should likely have the same alignment
asserts, as not all paths lead to detecting the misalignment of the provided
linear address. Will do a separate patch.
unmap_domain_page() seems to be able to deal with unaligned pointer. And
supporting unaligned pointer in vunmap()/unmap_domain_page_global()
would simplifyy call to those functions.
So I would consider to deal with the alignment rather than adding
ASSERT() in the two functions. destroy_xen_mappings() and
modify_xen_mappings() should stay as-is though.
Anyway, I don't think this is a 4.18 material.
---
xen/common/domain.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/common/domain.c b/xen/common/domain.c
index b8281d7cff9d..2dcc64e659cc 100644
--- a/xen/common/domain.c
+++ b/xen/common/domain.c
@@ -1634,7 +1634,7 @@ void unmap_guest_area(struct vcpu *v, struct guest_area
*area)
if ( pg )
{
- unmap_domain_page_global(map);
+ unmap_domain_page_global((void *)((unsigned long)map & PAGE_MASK));
Looking at the code, I can't find where 'map' may have become unaligned.
Do you have a pointer?
Depending on the answer, the call in map_guest_area() may also need some
adjustment.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
|