[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] xsm: removing inclusion of byteorder.h
- To: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 14:16:27 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=zU5Z0i3NUhZdc8tX6y72oy8QApCF0gyU1xHpLeTi4nc=; b=j9ArLHGPl+GQBbHy62XfOXHsUe3UFteFz17vYgqiJXJARzfPlFz4rUBnP9XjaXevZ8bK/v8X4DgKigpruYOpwABVvs25ZZ3I8iAR9qRypZJNYo4R0l0d0hqzSe6ZHEYLR+bpwblcumMZdQd2gjKm4kn7/5rWb0CzvPll7iD7rzmiaUTMQpCOH8dxHyA4dgV8/v9IuAEtEcfz7zlYFhDF0yuB9NjPxmPCOBFDYYXvS3JZrpHSDmiOHWxrF08vgt/XCdqqNlprm4X7sFPzrqN9NhAdHtQhZX6uhKUnxml7L2WvkdTobfxp6IFjiRrrt6BVEREMYb75bKmJpyUkw9d7JQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PAzqPlgDEYZLB9uq5qAoXqnlN+IkQAXl/+bw0Yb7XFHhEeoq2qSNzAwhC8/COwP4xhTAHxuWiUvMg7aYZSGPZTe+EY9bRVIAiFvtvSGEH7bL224z1EwLSQxzzCMmTTuirtgyoAJXyQSGh0oQeSdIjE6LtmV+ZcpRpxJORNgSaESnJt2v0bP0n+/AOW2pNWwKs8veU/B76RMa5tCJ7oLHTOXUI8r68huzsepckG9unUbGb/L4OVi1WFEwLXsFxiZAIXYZkbOe98hhkOV7IdefS8WDpvOwlXzcMdjTM7WxspwDNDVymOlBn/zfiytMo9INNjmmlBegpUMzVx2SJmbw4g==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:16:47 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 16.08.2023 21:04, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> This is to complement patch 'common: move Linux-inherited fixed width type
> decls to common header' by removing the unnecessary include of
> 'asm/byteorder.h'. In the process of removing these includes, the ordering was
> corrected to comply with current coding style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I would have wanted to give this my R-b and put it in right away, but it
looks like it's based on a stale tree. The patch you reference was
committed a week ago (so you could also mention its hash), whereas your
patch looks to be based on what was there before.
Jan
|
