[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] build: add crypto/ to SUBDIRS
- To: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 17:00:30 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=E23m5Vmg+4oyUe+vKWdNsLUd01dKxYwmE6iWbQ5p+rA=; b=XX49h2YlkDL5p/VNr6Pte3Fq1nEUjE0zrw2fExmws/6+QVHJxOqA742lE83LZ8P/DzAOQOW1+CYHsT1LC/CvstLBSOHRn029PfeCMnNGhvT5sIV2VWQmcyq98x7QgSGSKfDJB0X3P4J4vvbtvui8Dljm1Y4+fIWkzRJrwP+TJOvjWNon1UYkoIAWCYWjUYLXqTVvekvF5oFMDLdj5T+l6d7e5uDSLqwJTBtjIN0GJy4KaZkaGPxZp4Oyl8V02A+lOqxuY9VK2jRIb2Vol8bab0Sjvfz5ptmEZxO9LYjBRR0yQ563ocf/fvbu1TxtQSU1l4MJZPhkoKgHgivyYNbD5g==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=TD8AyEayYP/RevqFmyOkFBe+GB/+zG94o9TTiotgr56t6a2h6CQ92sfxnPJaONcZJ9tDAPHySXOoOYDAeLstdKohadaFkOMsdblLxSp7xR2uXOQrgZbrzs4VU/mg7qpUCuPfp4o43D0ZOU4iZUFDeuZLnKOEnQlZgABEU9se9PNuxYXxpXx9sZW/PTos17VI8N800NEhGUSkeun0/ryDuKtzcnZylU7JwJmVnGiF72EVhZfORXP3uX7o7A0syTBLAu2wFVuSvHpGXZl9Fl/1W7BUuxLHnYGPew8WgQB7ZmqCRnHLu+NhELAKiH6zaYYXDC60dOGeZx3ph6scqgqpQw==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 16:00:35 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 27.02.2023 16:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Well, I'm not outright opposed. But I definitely want to hear another
> maintainer's view before deciding.
Oh, and I should have added: If to be taken, the description would need
extending to explain why the simple route is taken here, and why it is
deemed okay to consider crypto for as little or as much as is, in the
eventual final version, going to be covered in the final version (i.e.
in the version as submitted it would want clarifying why it is okay to
include for Arm despite being unused there).
Jan
|
