[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] efi: Relocate the ESRT when booting via multiboot2
- To: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:00:07 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=QFBsSfanF/G/8mwfNr9fgD43rwYBz3jtPGkAwp+2Pss=; b=f0TqE5fIMXIsiW572CU2wOZ/byXTkJBUvQjKT7CLq/mHfhKcukAYGJOZSN4NUJOz3Jp0fkLoaA1VmT2q5hQCgoqP/Ca6xGRigs34udx0to6IaavLXZ6vj9n9dD2kf21a2C78ga2FIPNsOF/ZVkNeXoqOBe86BViXNzMVmhdqM/6uXO24a8H9/MEyuzafL+lMDf7nwsQYpENRSpGaT4sLevoUnk0+MLJvOC6wd3+/n6mwePBPB2P0PTJPcLlMgxV2alHTmMxHTsNS7KQLTsnGUkyPd4teE9Awkg2+eJh3fusm0Qj7bXPqM7oUGhfYOg++pqQ4ZQa1O3lnI8IJILjojQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=EBtUCAwegMFkdSkKQxksu6RfYS2x7p5fg3HhDnx1CoudTPzGK5Ki7boRCxW0DJ/pdVndVoPTVERoVrdpjploReKXbpGfHzxg4BSgfozKR+JNWftbaMr6v3/E2rWgVNjpz6udKKm/3Fxe3tx30pOixNOhDEzWRRCB3Lf8MV3Tt/Sclk0jLEO4GTMLPRFfj+fH7lx8ExGrMD82q46L5VLqpg8Wu1DaznliEx541m9/I1YC4szvSdU+kHnYnCtwWUaWLyFeeVzwyr7RArDBb+JpFw3TuMB+rbHxEzMU3SpcxB5cWmDXKuMjLwFWP/4oQ7ksHpsdR7GGwbJObVaEuSrupw==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:00:19 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 14.12.2022 10:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.12.2022 00:03, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> This was missed in the initial patchset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I'm sorry, but no: In a v2 submission you should address prior comments.
> On v1 I did offer to extend the description while committing, but you
> should not take this as an invitation to make the committer again put
> more time into getting this into the tree than should actually be needed
> (and reviewers to re-figure the unmentioned aspect).
So I thought I'd be kind and do what I said I didn't really want to do,
but things are worse: The patch again doesn't apply, this time because
of assuming an apparently private patch of yours to also be in place.
As it's merely patch context which is a problem, I'll edit the patch,
but only to be done with it rather than wasting yet more time.
Jan
|
