[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH V6 00/24] IOREQ feature (+ virtio-mmio) on Arm
Hi Jan, On 29/01/2021 09:04, Jan Beulich wrote: On 29.01.2021 02:48, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:Julien Grall (3): xen/ioreq: Make x86's IOREQ related dm-op handling common xen/mm: Make x86's XENMEM_resource_ioreq_server handling common arm/ioreq: Introduce arch specific bits for IOREQ/DM features Oleksandr Tyshchenko (21): x86/ioreq: Prepare IOREQ feature for making it common x86/ioreq: Add IOREQ_STATUS_* #define-s and update code for moving x86/ioreq: Provide out-of-line wrapper for the handle_mmio() xen/ioreq: Make x86's IOREQ feature common xen/ioreq: Make x86's hvm_ioreq_needs_completion() common xen/ioreq: Make x86's hvm_mmio_first(last)_byte() common xen/ioreq: Make x86's hvm_ioreq_(page/vcpu/server) structs common xen/ioreq: Move x86's ioreq_server to struct domain xen/ioreq: Move x86's io_completion/io_req fields to struct vcpu xen/ioreq: Remove "hvm" prefixes from involved function names xen/ioreq: Use guest_cmpxchg64() instead of cmpxchg() xen/arm: Call vcpu_ioreq_handle_completion() in check_for_vcpu_work() xen/mm: Handle properly reference in set_foreign_p2m_entry() on Arm xen/ioreq: Introduce domain_has_ioreq_server() xen/dm: Introduce xendevicemodel_set_irq_level DM opGoing through the series I noticed that at least this one is still lacking acks. I may have overlooked others. Do you have a clear picture of which acks you still need to hunt for? I have pinged the tools maintainers to get an ack on the series. I went through the rest of the series, everything else looks suitably acked. Cheers, -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |