[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MAINTAINERS vs libxl

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:55:13 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:55:25 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 27.01.21 16:36, Jan Beulich wrote:

In commit 032a96e5ef38 tools/libxl/ was split into
tools/libs/light/ and tools/libs/guest/. Wasn't the latter
rather meant to be tools/libs/util/, as that's the other part
of what had previously resided under tools/libxl/?


Oh, indeed.


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

References:
- MAINTAINERS vs libxl
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH v7 09/10] xen/vmtrace: support for VM forks
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH V5 15/22] xen/arm: Call vcpu_ioreq_handle_completion() in check_for_vcpu_work()
Previous by thread: Re: MAINTAINERS vs libxl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.