[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

MAINTAINERS vs libxl

To: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:36:50 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:36:53 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

In commit 032a96e5ef38 tools/libxl/ was split into
tools/libs/light/ and tools/libs/guest/. Wasn't the latter
rather meant to be tools/libs/util/, as that's the other part
of what had previously resided under tools/libxl/?

Jan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MAINTAINERS vs libxl
  - From: Jürgen Groß
- Re: MAINTAINERS vs libxl
  - From: Ian Jackson

Prev by Date: [linux-5.4 test] 158681: regressions - FAIL
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] libxlutil: avoid almost-undefined behavior
Previous by thread: [linux-5.4 test] 158681: regressions - FAIL
Next by thread: Re: MAINTAINERS vs libxl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.