Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] xen: credit2: limit the number of CPUs per runqueue

[Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@xxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 14:08 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 28.05.2020 23:29, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > Dario Faggioli (7):
> >       xen: credit2: factor cpu to runqueue matching in a function
> >       xen: credit2: factor runqueue initialization in its own
> > function.
> >       xen: cpupool: add a back-pointer from a scheduler to its pool
> >       xen: credit2: limit the max number of CPUs in a runqueue
> >       xen: credit2: compute cpus per-runqueue more dynamically.
> >       cpupool: create an the 'cpupool sync' infrastructure
> >       xen: credit2: rebalance the number of CPUs in the scheduler
> > runqueues
> 
> I still have the last three patches here as well as "xen: credit2:
> document that min_rqd is valid and ok to use" in my "waiting for
> sufficient acks" folder. 
>
Ok.

> Would you mind indicating if they should
> stay there (and you will take care of pinging or whatever is
> needed), or whether I may drop them (and you'll eventually re-
> submit)?
> 
So, the last 3 patches of this series, despite their status is indeed
"waiting for sufficient acks", in the sense that they've not been
looked at due to code freeze being imminent back then, but it still
would be ok for people to look at them, I'm happy for you to drop this
from your queue.

I will take care of resending just them in a new series and everything.
And thanks.

For the min_rqd one... That should be quite easy, in theory, so let me
ping the thread right now. Especially considering that I just looked
back at it, and noticed that I forgot to Cc George in the first place!
:-O

Regards
-- 
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D
http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Virtualization Software Engineer
SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part