Re: [PATCH] libxl: tooling expects wrong errno

[Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:39:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Paul Durrant writes ("RE: [PATCH] libxl: tooling expects wrong errno"):
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Thanks for the analysis.  So:
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > This would seem to be a backport candidate.  AFAICT check has been
> > > there, looking for ENOSYS, since this code was introduced in
> > >    826eb17271d3c647516d9944c47b0779afedea25
> > >    libxl: suppress device assignment to HVM guest when there is no IOMMU
> > > ?
> > > 
> > > But that commit has a Tested-by.  Maybe Xen changed its error return
> > > at some point ?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, it happened in 71e617a6b8f69849c70eda1b3c58f1ff6b244e5a
> > use is_iommu_enabled() where appropriate...
> 
> So,
> 
> Backport: 4.13
> 
> Thanks!

This is not yet committed. Paul, can I get a release ack from you?

Wei.

> 
> Ian.