[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 09/47] xen/sched: move some per-vcpu items to struct sched_unit
On 14.09.2019 10:52, Juergen Gross wrote: > Affinities are scheduler specific attributes, they should be per > scheduling unit. So move all affinity related fields in struct vcpu > to struct sched_unit. While at it switch affinity related functions in > sched-if.h to use a pointer to sched_unit instead to vcpu as parameter. > > The affinity_broken flag must be kept per vcpu as it is related to > guest actions on specific vcpus. When support of multiple vcpus per > sched_unit is being added, a unit is regarded as being subject to > "broken affinity" when any of its vcpus has the affinity_broken flag > set. > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> > --- > V2: > - move affinity_broken back to struct vcpu (Jan Beulich) > - print affinities only once per unit (Jan Beulich) > --- > xen/common/domain.c | 15 ++------ > xen/common/domctl.c | 13 ++++--- > xen/common/keyhandler.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++-------------- Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> with one minor remark: > --- a/xen/common/keyhandler.c > +++ b/xen/common/keyhandler.c > @@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ static void reboot_machine(unsigned char key, struct > cpu_user_regs *regs) > static void dump_domains(unsigned char key) > { > struct domain *d; > + struct sched_unit *unit; > struct vcpu *v; > s_time_t now = NOW(); I can see how it would look a little odd here because of the neighboring variables, but generally speaking the new one should be pointer to const (and the old ones should have been, too, afaict). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |