[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] xen: fix debugtrace clearing
On 05.09.2019 13:39, Juergen Gross wrote: > After dumping the debugtrace buffer it is cleared. This results in some > entries not being printed in case the buffer is dumped again before > having wrapped. > > While at it remove the trailing zero byte in the buffer as it is no > longer needed. Commit b5e6e1ee8da59f introduced passing the number of > chars to be printed in the related interfaces, so the trailing 0 byte > is no longer required. > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> Technically this is fine, so it can have my Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> However, ... > @@ -1173,6 +1175,7 @@ static char *debugtrace_buf; /* Debug-trace > buffer */ > static unsigned int debugtrace_prd; /* Producer index */ > static unsigned int debugtrace_kilobytes = 128, debugtrace_bytes; > static unsigned int debugtrace_used; > +static char debugtrace_last_entry_buf[DEBUG_TRACE_ENTRY_SIZE]; ... this is what I was afraid would happen, but I admit I didn't reply in a way previously indicating that I dislike such a solution. This is also why, when noticing the issue, I didn't put together a patch myself right away. In particular I'm of the opinion that the three last_* values would better all stay together, and then would better stay inside the only function using them. > @@ -1279,11 +1280,11 @@ void debugtrace_printk(const char *fmt, ...) > } > else > { > - if ( strcmp(buf, last_buf) ) > + if ( strcmp(buf, debugtrace_last_entry_buf) ) Wouldn't moving count to file scope and latching its value into a new dump_count when dumping work: if ( count == dump_count || strcmp(buf, last_buf) ) work? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |