[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 09/13] pci: switch pci_conf_read32 to use pci_sbdf_t
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 08:36:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 07.06.19 at 11:22, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > @@ -817,7 +811,7 @@ static u64 read_pci_mem_bar(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 slot, > > u8 func, u8 bir, int vf) > > if ( ++bir >= limit ) > > return 0; > > return addr + disp + > > - ((u64)pci_conf_read32(seg, bus, slot, func, > > + ((u64)pci_conf_read32(PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, slot, func), > > base + bir * 4) << 32); > > Not taking the opportunity to switch to uint64_t here, like you do > elsewhere? > > > @@ -750,7 +747,7 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn, > > for ( i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; ) > > { > > unsigned int idx = pos + PCI_SRIOV_BAR + i * 4; > > - u32 bar = pci_conf_read32(seg, bus, slot, func, idx); > > + u32 bar = pci_conf_read32(pdev->sbdf, idx); > > Similarly here. Sorry, I tried to fix the surrounding issues when touching the code, but some of those slipped. Will fix in next version. > > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/quirks.c > > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/quirks.c > > @@ -128,9 +128,11 @@ static void __init map_igd_reg(void) > > if ( igd_reg_va ) > > return; > > > > - igd_mmio = pci_conf_read32(0, 0, IGD_DEV, 0, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1); > > + igd_mmio = pci_conf_read32(PCI_SBDF(0, 0, IGD_DEV, 0), > > Afaict at this point all uses of IGD_DEV are in constructs like this one. > As previously say, I think IGD_DEV itself would now better become an > invocation of PCI_SBDF(). Same for IOH_DEV then. Is it fine to do this as a followup patch? Or else I would also have to modify the pci_conf_read{8,16} calls that use IGD_DEV or IOH_DEV in this patch. Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |