Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Ian,

On 5/20/19 5:04 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Julien Grall writes ("Re: [xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL"):
> > Before the last 2 flights, the kernel was compiled natively. Now it is
> > cross-compiled on x86 machine. So there are a difference in the way the kernel
> > is built.
> That is indeed suspicious.
>
> > Could we try a flight with kernel built from the cubietruck?
> I had to do some work on the tooling, but I think I have this running
> now.  136626/136627.  I may need to restart it...
@Ian: I didn't see test result in my inbox for those 2 flights. Was 
there any issues with them?
> > On a side note, I noticed that the name of the file [1] leads to think it is a
> > gzip, but it is actually a plain text.
> ...
> > [1]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/136385/test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2/cubietruck-gleizes---var-log-xen-console-guest-debian.guest.osstest.log.gz
> $ HEAD 
> 'http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/136385/test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2/cubietruck-gleizes---var-log-xen-console-guest-debian.guest.osstest.log.gz'
> 200 OK
> Connection: close
> Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 16:00:38 GMT
> Accept-Ranges: bytes
> ETag: "3fba-5892bd4a5e8c7"
> Server: Apache/2.4.25 (Debian)
> Content-Encoding: x-gzip
> Content-Length: 16314
> Content-Type: application/x-gzip
> Last-Modified: Sat, 18 May 2019 16:17:07 GMT
> Client-Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 16:00:38 GMT
> Client-Peer: 205.237.98.146:80
> Client-Response-Num: 1
>
> $
>
> This is wrong.  It is saying that it is going to send a gzipped
> gzipfile.
Thank you for looking at it!

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel