|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL
Hi Ian, On 20/05/2019 11:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
There are indeed some cache mismanagement on Xen 4.11, but they were never reliable. In this case, they seem to be reliable. So this may well be different. Before the last 2 flights, the kernel was compiled natively. Now it is cross-compiled on x86 machine. So there are a difference in the way the kernel is built. Could we try a flight with kernel built from the cubietruck?On a side note, I noticed that the name of the file [1] leads to think it is a gzip, but it is actually a plain text. Cheers,[1] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/136385/test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2/cubietruck-gleizes---var-log-xen-console-guest-debian.guest.osstest.log.gz Ian. -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |