Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL"):
> On 20.05.19 at 12:30, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions 
> > - 
> >>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail 
> >> REGR. vs. 135683
> >>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail 
> >> REGR. vs. 135683
> > 
> > These are a known bug.  The Debian "stretch" ("stable") i386 kernel
> > simply does not work under Xen HVM.  I don't thnk this is anything to
> > do with the 4.11 Xen commits under test here.  It is appearing here in
> > this flight because I reorganised the amd64/i386 test jobs.
> 
> Did this reorg include a change in the naming scheme? I ask because
> only the latter of the two includes "i386" in the name, i.e. by the
> known to me naming model the former ought to use a 64-bit guest.

You are right.  Hrrrm.  I will investigate further.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel