Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 20.05.19 at 12:30, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.11-testing test] 136385: regressions - 
> FAIL"):
>> flight 136385 xen-4.11-testing real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/136385/ 
>> 
>> Regressions :-(
>> 
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. 
>> vs. 135683
>>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail 
>> REGR. vs. 135683
> 
> These are a known bug.  The Debian "stretch" ("stable") i386 kernel
> simply does not work under Xen HVM.  I don't thnk this is anything to
> do with the 4.11 Xen commits under test here.  It is appearing here in
> this flight because I reorganised the amd64/i386 test jobs.

Did this reorg include a change in the naming scheme? I ask because
only the latter of the two includes "i386" in the name, i.e. by the
known to me naming model the former ought to use a 64-bit guest.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel