[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model asynchronous

To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:22:29 +0000
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:22:39 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model 
asynchronous"):
> It looks cleaner to me to have *something* there than not, just to visually 
> make it clear that it has nothing to do with the previous function.

That's OK by me.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/9] libxl: Remove redundant pidpath setting
  - From: George Dunlap
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model asynchronous
  - From: George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model asynchronous
  - From: Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model asynchronous
  - From: George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model asynchronous
  - From: George Dunlap

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 4.19.5 fails to boot as Xen dom0
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] ns16550: enable use of PCI MSI
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model asynchronous
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model asynchronous
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.