|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model asynchronous
George Dunlap writes ("[PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model
asynchronous"):
> Or at least, give it an asynchronous interface so that we can make it
> actually asynchronous in subsequent patches.
>
> Create state structures and callback function signatures. Add the
> state structure to libxl__destroy_domid_state. Break
> libxl__destroy_domid down into two functions.
...
> +/* Used to detroy the device model */
> +_hidden void libxl__destroy_device_model(libxl__egc *egc,
> + libxl__destroy_devicemodel_state
> *ddms);
I think that comment is rather pointless (but I won't object if you
really want to keep it). Conversely it would be nice to say somewhere
that ddms->callback may be called reentrantly.
Everything else LGTM.
Thanks,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |