[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model asynchronous
George Dunlap writes ("[PATCH 7/9] libxl: Make killing of device model asynchronous"): > Or at least, give it an asynchronous interface so that we can make it > actually asynchronous in subsequent patches. > > Create state structures and callback function signatures. Add the > state structure to libxl__destroy_domid_state. Break > libxl__destroy_domid down into two functions. ... > +/* Used to detroy the device model */ > +_hidden void libxl__destroy_device_model(libxl__egc *egc, > + libxl__destroy_devicemodel_state > *ddms); I think that comment is rather pointless (but I won't object if you really want to keep it). Conversely it would be nice to say somewhere that ddms->callback may be called reentrantly. Everything else LGTM. Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |