Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 01.10.18 at 18:07, <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/10/2018 17:48, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/01/2018 04:40 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> If there isn't an obvious fix, then the switch of default scheduler
>>> needs reverting until there is a fix present.  This is currently
>>> blocking master.
>> 
>> Agreed.  I'd argue for ignoring failures to set scheduler parameters on
>> migrate, on the grounds that this will be less risk to the project as a
>> whole than reverting credit2 again.  But either way we should do
>> something quickly.
> 
> We should ignore a mismatch of the scheduler. Failures when setting
> parameters for a matching scheduler should not be ignored IMO.

Well, depends on whether the scheduler was explicitly chosen.
I don't think migration should succeed when e.g. RTDS was used
and isn't available on the destination host.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel