[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] x86/iommu: add PVH support to the inclusive options
>>> On 31.07.18 at 17:27, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 05:15:22PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 08:52:14AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > >>> On 27.07.18 at 17:31, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c >> > > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c >> > > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ >> > > #include <xen/softirq.h> >> > > #include <xsm/xsm.h> >> > > >> > > +#include <asm/apicdef.h> >> > > +#include <asm/io_apic.h> >> > >> > Why? You're looking for the guest view of things, which I don't >> > think you can derive from definitions in these two headers. >> >> I can use the domain state for the lapic and the ioapic... >> >> > > + /* ... or the PCIe MCFG regions. */ >> > > + for ( i = 0; i < pci_mmcfg_config_num; i++ ) >> > > + { >> > > + unsigned long addr = PFN_DOWN(pci_mmcfg_config[i].address); >> > > + >> > > + if ( pfn >= addr + (pci_mmcfg_config[i].start_bus_number << 8) >> > > && >> > > + pfn < addr + (pci_mmcfg_config[i].end_bus_number << 8) ) >> > > + return false; >> > > + } >> > >> > Same here - this would better use domain state. >> >> ... but pci mcfg regions are currently added after the iommu >> initialization in the HVM dom0 builder. I can shuffle that call so >> that iommu initialization is performed after the mcfg regions are >> added. > > So that's not so easy. The current hvm_mmcfg used to store the MMCFG > data in the domain struct is private to io.c, I could move it's > declaration to a header file, but maybe it's better to just use > pci_mmcfg_config directly? Or add a helper function in that file? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |