Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/13] iommu: track reserved ranges using a rangeset

[Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> George Dunlap
> Sent: 11 July 2018 10:16
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kevin Tian
> <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>; Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/13] iommu: track reserved ranges
> using a rangeset
> 
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Ranges that should be considered reserved in the IOMMU are not
> necessarily
> > limited to RMRRs. If iommu_inclusive_mapping is set then any frame
> number
> > falling within an E820 reserved region should also be considered as
> > reserved in the IOMMU.
> > This patch adds a rangeset to the domain_iommu structure that is then
> used
> > to track all reserved ranges. This will be needed by a subsequent patch
> > to test whether it is safe to modify a particular IOMMU entry.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > v2:
> >  - New in v2.
> > ---
> >  xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c       | 10 +++++++++-
> >  xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c   | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> >  xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/vtd.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  xen/include/xen/iommu.h               |  6 ++++++
> >  4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> > index 7e59211a59..3fbd3ebaf6 100644
> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c
> > @@ -147,6 +147,10 @@ int iommu_domain_init(struct domain *d)
> >      if ( !iommu_enabled )
> >          return 0;
> >
> > +    hd->reserved_ranges = rangeset_new(d, NULL, 0);
> > +    if ( !hd->reserved_ranges )
> > +        return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> >      hd->platform_ops = iommu_get_ops();
> >      return hd->platform_ops->init(d);
> >  }
> > @@ -249,12 +253,16 @@ int iommu_construct(struct domain *d)
> >
> >  void iommu_domain_destroy(struct domain *d)
> >  {
> > -    if ( !iommu_enabled || !dom_iommu(d)->platform_ops )
> > +    const struct domain_iommu *hd = dom_iommu(d);
> > +
> > +    if ( !iommu_enabled || !hd->platform_ops )
> >          return;
> >
> >      iommu_teardown(d);
> >
> >      arch_iommu_domain_destroy(d);
> > +
> > +    rangeset_destroy(hd->reserved_ranges);
> >  }
> >
> >  int iommu_map_page(struct domain *d, bfn_t bfn, mfn_t mfn,
> > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> > index 2aa97c9efe..7cd3813b9f 100644
> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> > @@ -1911,6 +1911,7 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain
> *d, bool_t map,
> >      unsigned long end_pfn = PAGE_ALIGN_4K(rmrr->end_address) >>
> PAGE_SHIFT_4K;
> >      struct mapped_rmrr *mrmrr;
> >      struct domain_iommu *hd = dom_iommu(d);
> > +    int err = 0;
> >
> >      ASSERT(pcidevs_locked());
> >      ASSERT(rmrr->base_address < rmrr->end_address);
> > @@ -1924,8 +1925,6 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain
> *d, bool_t map,
> >          if ( mrmrr->base == rmrr->base_address &&
> >               mrmrr->end == rmrr->end_address )
> >          {
> > -            int ret = 0;
> > -
> >              if ( map )
> >              {
> >                  ++mrmrr->count;
> > @@ -1935,28 +1934,35 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain
> *d, bool_t map,
> >              if ( --mrmrr->count )
> >                  return 0;
> >
> > -            while ( base_pfn < end_pfn )
> > +            err = rangeset_remove_range(hd->reserved_ranges,
> > +                                        base_pfn, end_pfn);
> > +            while ( !err && base_pfn < end_pfn )
> >              {
> >                  if ( clear_identity_p2m_entry(d, base_pfn) )
> > -                    ret = -ENXIO;
> > +                    err = -ENXIO;
> > +
> >                  base_pfn++;
> >              }
> >
> >              list_del(&mrmrr->list);
> >              xfree(mrmrr);
> > -            return ret;
> > +            return err;
> >          }
> >      }
> >
> >      if ( !map )
> >          return -ENOENT;
> >
> > +    err = rangeset_add_range(hd->reserved_ranges, base_pfn, end_pfn);
> > +    if ( err )
> > +        return err;
> > +
> >      while ( base_pfn < end_pfn )
> >      {
> > -        int err = set_identity_p2m_entry(d, base_pfn, p2m_access_rw, flag);
> > -
> > +        err = set_identity_p2m_entry(d, base_pfn, p2m_access_rw, flag);
> >          if ( err )
> >              return err;
> > +
> >          base_pfn++;
> >      }
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/vtd.c
> b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/vtd.c
> > index dc37dce4b6..d65d3c60fb 100644
> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/vtd.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/vtd.c
> > @@ -155,16 +155,32 @@ void __hwdom_init
> vtd_set_hwdom_mapping(struct domain *d)
> >          tmp = 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT_4K);
> >          for ( j = 0; j < tmp; j++ )
> >          {
> > -            int ret = iommu_map_page(d, _bfn(pfn * tmp + j),
> > -                                     _mfn(pfn * tmp + j),
> > -                                     IOMMUF_readable|IOMMUF_writable);
> > +            bfn_t bfn = _bfn(pfn * tmp + j);
> > +            mfn_t mfn = _mfn(pfn * tmp + j);
> 
> Everything looks good to me except for this; but as this isn't my area
> of maintainership I'll just register my opinion and let the
> maintainers decide.
> 

Oh, that looks like it should have been in a previous patch.

> Everything else:
> 
> Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

Thanks,

  Paul

>  -George
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel