[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/13] iommu: track reserved ranges using a rangeset
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ranges that should be considered reserved in the IOMMU are not necessarily > limited to RMRRs. If iommu_inclusive_mapping is set then any frame number > falling within an E820 reserved region should also be considered as > reserved in the IOMMU. > This patch adds a rangeset to the domain_iommu structure that is then used > to track all reserved ranges. This will be needed by a subsequent patch > to test whether it is safe to modify a particular IOMMU entry. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> > > v2: > - New in v2. > --- > xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 10 +++++++++- > xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c | 20 +++++++++++++------- > xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/vtd.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++---- > xen/include/xen/iommu.h | 6 ++++++ > 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > index 7e59211a59..3fbd3ebaf6 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > @@ -147,6 +147,10 @@ int iommu_domain_init(struct domain *d) > if ( !iommu_enabled ) > return 0; > > + hd->reserved_ranges = rangeset_new(d, NULL, 0); > + if ( !hd->reserved_ranges ) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > hd->platform_ops = iommu_get_ops(); > return hd->platform_ops->init(d); > } > @@ -249,12 +253,16 @@ int iommu_construct(struct domain *d) > > void iommu_domain_destroy(struct domain *d) > { > - if ( !iommu_enabled || !dom_iommu(d)->platform_ops ) > + const struct domain_iommu *hd = dom_iommu(d); > + > + if ( !iommu_enabled || !hd->platform_ops ) > return; > > iommu_teardown(d); > > arch_iommu_domain_destroy(d); > + > + rangeset_destroy(hd->reserved_ranges); > } > > int iommu_map_page(struct domain *d, bfn_t bfn, mfn_t mfn, > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > index 2aa97c9efe..7cd3813b9f 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > @@ -1911,6 +1911,7 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain *d, > bool_t map, > unsigned long end_pfn = PAGE_ALIGN_4K(rmrr->end_address) >> > PAGE_SHIFT_4K; > struct mapped_rmrr *mrmrr; > struct domain_iommu *hd = dom_iommu(d); > + int err = 0; > > ASSERT(pcidevs_locked()); > ASSERT(rmrr->base_address < rmrr->end_address); > @@ -1924,8 +1925,6 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain *d, > bool_t map, > if ( mrmrr->base == rmrr->base_address && > mrmrr->end == rmrr->end_address ) > { > - int ret = 0; > - > if ( map ) > { > ++mrmrr->count; > @@ -1935,28 +1934,35 @@ static int rmrr_identity_mapping(struct domain *d, > bool_t map, > if ( --mrmrr->count ) > return 0; > > - while ( base_pfn < end_pfn ) > + err = rangeset_remove_range(hd->reserved_ranges, > + base_pfn, end_pfn); > + while ( !err && base_pfn < end_pfn ) > { > if ( clear_identity_p2m_entry(d, base_pfn) ) > - ret = -ENXIO; > + err = -ENXIO; > + > base_pfn++; > } > > list_del(&mrmrr->list); > xfree(mrmrr); > - return ret; > + return err; > } > } > > if ( !map ) > return -ENOENT; > > + err = rangeset_add_range(hd->reserved_ranges, base_pfn, end_pfn); > + if ( err ) > + return err; > + > while ( base_pfn < end_pfn ) > { > - int err = set_identity_p2m_entry(d, base_pfn, p2m_access_rw, flag); > - > + err = set_identity_p2m_entry(d, base_pfn, p2m_access_rw, flag); > if ( err ) > return err; > + > base_pfn++; > } > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/vtd.c > b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/vtd.c > index dc37dce4b6..d65d3c60fb 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/vtd.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/vtd.c > @@ -155,16 +155,32 @@ void __hwdom_init vtd_set_hwdom_mapping(struct domain > *d) > tmp = 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT_4K); > for ( j = 0; j < tmp; j++ ) > { > - int ret = iommu_map_page(d, _bfn(pfn * tmp + j), > - _mfn(pfn * tmp + j), > - IOMMUF_readable|IOMMUF_writable); > + bfn_t bfn = _bfn(pfn * tmp + j); > + mfn_t mfn = _mfn(pfn * tmp + j); Everything looks good to me except for this; but as this isn't my area of maintainership I'll just register my opinion and let the maintainers decide. Everything else: Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |