[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/8] x86/AMD: distinguish compute units from hyper-threads
>>> On 12.07.18 at 15:02, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/07/18 13:07, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Fam17 replaces CUs by HTs, which we should reflect accordingly, even if >> the difference is not very big. The most relevant change (requiring some >> code restructuring) is that the topoext feature no longer means there is >> a valid CU ID. >> >> Take the opportunity and convert wrongly plain int variables in >> set_cpu_sibling_map() to unsigned int. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> >> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c >> @@ -504,17 +504,23 @@ static void amd_get_topology(struct cpui >> u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx; >> >> cpuid(0x8000001e, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx); >> - c->compute_unit_id = ebx & 0xFF; >> c->x86_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 0x3) + 1; >> + >> + if (c->x86 < 0x17) >> + c->compute_unit_id = ebx & 0xFF; >> + else { >> + c->cpu_core_id = ebx & 0xFF; >> + c->x86_max_cores /= c->x86_num_siblings; >> + } > > The indentation here is odd. It turns out the function uses entirely > 8-spaces rather than tabs, like the rest of the file. Ouch - didn't notice this. > Would you mind either retaining spaces, or fixing up the entire function > (probably easiest as a prereq patch) ? I'll fix this up here, not in a prereq patch (for backporting's sake). I'll consider adding a follow-up patch. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |