[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/8] x86/AMD: distinguish compute units from hyper-threads
Fam17 replaces CUs by HTs, which we should reflect accordingly, even if the difference is not very big. The most relevant change (requiring some code restructuring) is that the topoext feature no longer means there is a valid CU ID. Take the opportunity and convert wrongly plain int variables in set_cpu_sibling_map() to unsigned int. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c @@ -504,17 +504,23 @@ static void amd_get_topology(struct cpui u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx; cpuid(0x8000001e, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx); - c->compute_unit_id = ebx & 0xFF; c->x86_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 0x3) + 1; + + if (c->x86 < 0x17) + c->compute_unit_id = ebx & 0xFF; + else { + c->cpu_core_id = ebx & 0xFF; + c->x86_max_cores /= c->x86_num_siblings; + } } if (opt_cpu_info) printk("CPU %d(%d) -> Processor %d, %s %d\n", cpu, c->x86_max_cores, c->phys_proc_id, - cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT) ? "Compute Unit" : - "Core", - cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT) ? c->compute_unit_id : - c->cpu_core_id); + c->compute_unit_id != INVALID_CUID ? "Compute Unit" + : "Core", + c->compute_unit_id != INVALID_CUID ? c->compute_unit_id + : c->cpu_core_id); } static void early_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) --- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c @@ -236,33 +236,41 @@ static void link_thread_siblings(int cpu cpumask_set_cpu(cpu2, per_cpu(cpu_core_mask, cpu1)); } -static void set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu) +static void set_cpu_sibling_map(unsigned int cpu) { - int i; + unsigned int i; struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = cpu_data; cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_sibling_setup_map); cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, socket_cpumask[cpu_to_socket(cpu)]); + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, per_cpu(cpu_core_mask, cpu)); + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, per_cpu(cpu_sibling_mask, cpu)); if ( c[cpu].x86_num_siblings > 1 ) { for_each_cpu ( i, &cpu_sibling_setup_map ) { - if ( cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT) ) { - if ( (c[cpu].phys_proc_id == c[i].phys_proc_id) && - (c[cpu].compute_unit_id == c[i].compute_unit_id) ) + if ( cpu == i || c[cpu].phys_proc_id != c[i].phys_proc_id ) + continue; + if ( c[cpu].compute_unit_id != INVALID_CUID && + c[i].compute_unit_id != INVALID_CUID ) + { + if ( c[cpu].compute_unit_id == c[i].compute_unit_id ) link_thread_siblings(cpu, i); - } else if ( (c[cpu].phys_proc_id == c[i].phys_proc_id) && - (c[cpu].cpu_core_id == c[i].cpu_core_id) ) { - link_thread_siblings(cpu, i); } + else if ( c[cpu].cpu_core_id != XEN_INVALID_CORE_ID && + c[i].cpu_core_id != XEN_INVALID_CORE_ID ) + { + if ( c[cpu].cpu_core_id == c[i].cpu_core_id ) + link_thread_siblings(cpu, i); + } + else + printk(XENLOG_WARNING + "CPU%u: unclear relationship with CPU%u\n", + cpu, i); } } - else - { - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, per_cpu(cpu_sibling_mask, cpu)); - } if ( c[cpu].x86_max_cores == 1 ) { _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |