[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/10] x86: Introduce a function to check the value of RTIT_CTL
>>> On 03.07.18 at 12:19, <luwei.kang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > + /* >> > + * Any attempt to modify IA32_RTIT_CTL while TraceEn is set will >> > + * result in a #GP unless the same write also clears TraceEn. >> > + */ >> > + if ( (ipt_desc->ipt_guest.ctl & RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN) && >> > + ((ipt_desc->ipt_guest.ctl ^ new) & ~RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN) ) >> >> Why the ^ ? You only need to check whether new has the bit clear. > > I mean if change any bits (set or clear, not include RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN) with > PT is enabled (RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN is set) will inject an #GP. Hmm, maybe I was wrongly thinking that the earlier new != old check renders redundant the check here. >> > @@ -171,6 +279,8 @@ int ipt_do_wrmsr(unsigned int msr, uint64_t >> > msr_content) >> > switch ( msr ) >> > { >> > case MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL: >> > + if ( rtit_ctl_check(msr_content, ipt_desc->ipt_guest.ctl) ) >> > + return 1; >> > ipt_desc->ipt_guest.ctl = msr_content; >> > __vmwrite(GUEST_IA32_RTIT_CTL, msr_content); >> > break; >> >> Without this I don't see how the previous patch is complete. > > What about merge this patch with patch 7 ? That was the implied suggestion. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |