[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 04/10] x86: Add Intel Processor Trace MSRs and bit definitions
> > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h > > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/msr-index.h > > @@ -548,4 +548,41 @@ > > #define MSR_PKGC9_IRTL 0x00000634 > > #define MSR_PKGC10_IRTL 0x00000635 > > > > +/* Intel PT MSRs */ > > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL 0x00000570 > > +#define RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN (1ULL << 0) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_CYCEN (1ULL << 1) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_OS (1ULL << 2) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_USR (1ULL << 3) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_PWR_EVT_EN (1ULL << 4) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_FUP_ON_PTW (1ULL << 5) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_FABRIC_EN (1ULL << 6) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_CR3_FILTER (1ULL << 7) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_TOPA (1ULL << 8) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_MTC_EN (1ULL << 9) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_TSC_EN (1ULL << 10) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_DIS_RETC (1ULL << 11) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_PTW_EN (1ULL << 12) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_BRANCH_EN (1ULL << 13) > > +#define RTIT_CTL_MTC_FREQ_OFFSET 14 > > +#define RTIT_CTL_MTC_FREQ (0x0fULL << RTIT_CTL_MTC_FREQ_OFFSET) > > No duplicates like these please - with MASK_EXTR() / MASK_INSR() having just > the mask (and no offset/shift value) is sufficient. OK, get it. I just need to define +#define RTIT_CTL_MTC_FREQ (0x0fULL << RTIT_CTL_MTC_FREQ_OFFSET) If I want to get the value of this filed (bit17:14) just call "MASK_EXTR(v, RTIT_CTL_MTC_FREQ)" > > > +#define RTIT_CTL_ADDR(n) (0x0fULL << RTIT_CTL_ADDR_OFFSET(n)) > > +#define MSR_IA32_RTIT_STATUS 0x00000571 > > Please add blank lines between one MSR (and its bits) and the next one. Will fix it. Thanks, Luwei Kang _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |