[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] libs/evtchn: Remove active handler on clean-up or failure
Ross Lagerwall writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.10] libs/evtchn: Remove active handler on clean-up or failure"): > On 11/10/2017 05:10 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > > Commit 89d55473ed16543044a31d1e0d4660cf5a3f49df "xentoolcore_restrict_all: > > Implement for libxenevtchn" added a call to register allowing to > > restrict the event channel. > > > > However, the call to deregister the handler was not performed if open > > failed or when closing the event channel. This will result to corrupt > > the list of handlers and potentially crash the application later one. Sorry for not spotting this during review. The fix is correct as far as it goes, so: Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The call to xentoolcore_deregister_active_handle is done at the same > > place as for the grants. But I am not convinced this is thread safe as > > there are potential race between close the event channel and restict > > handler. Do we care about that? ... > However, I think it should call xentoolcore__deregister_active_handle() > _before_ calling osdep_evtchn_close() to avoid trying to restrict a > closed fd or some other fd that happens to have the same number. You are right. But this slightly weakens the guarantee provided by xentoolcore_restrict_all. > I think all the other libs need to be fixed as well, unless there was a > reason it was done this way. I will send a further patch. In the meantime I suggest we apply Julien's fix. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |