[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 19/31] xen/arm: Introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx> This code is completely borrowed from the patch series for Linux which hasn't been upstreamed yet: [PATCH v2 0/3] mailbox: arm: introduce smc triggered mailbox https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/23/129 I am very excited about the idea described it a link above. This solution lets us (who plays with ARM based SoCs with Security Extensions enabled, but without possibility to involve some standalone co-prossesor to control PM) have SCPI based CPUFreq in Xen on ARM with a minimal cost. Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/cpufreq/arm-smc-mailbox.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 155 insertions(+) create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/cpufreq/arm-smc-mailbox.c diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/cpufreq/arm-smc-mailbox.c b/xen/arch/arm/cpufreq/arm-smc-mailbox.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d7b61a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/xen/arch/arm/cpufreq/arm-smc-mailbox.c @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2016,2017 ARM Ltd. + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * This device provides a mechanism for emulating a mailbox by using + * smc calls, allowing a "mailbox" consumer to sit in firmware running + * on the same core. + */ + +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h> + +#define ARM_SMC_MBOX_USE_HVC BIT(0) + +struct arm_smc_chan_data { + u32 function_id; + u32 flags; +}; + +static int arm_smc_send_data(struct mbox_chan *link, void *data) +{ + struct arm_smc_chan_data *chan_data = link->con_priv; + u32 function_id = chan_data->function_id; + struct arm_smccc_res res; + u32 msg = *(u32 *)data; + + if (chan_data->flags & ARM_SMC_MBOX_USE_HVC) + arm_smccc_hvc(function_id, msg, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res); + else + arm_smccc_smc(function_id, msg, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res); + + mbox_chan_received_data(link, (void *)res.a0); + + return 0; +} + +/* This mailbox is synchronous, so we are always done. */ +static bool arm_smc_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *link) +{ + return true; +} + +static const struct mbox_chan_ops arm_smc_mbox_chan_ops = { + .send_data = arm_smc_send_data, + .last_tx_done = arm_smc_last_tx_done +}; + +static int arm_smc_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct mbox_controller *mbox; + struct arm_smc_chan_data *chan_data; + const char *method; + bool use_hvc = false; + int ret, i; + + ret = of_property_count_elems_of_size(dev->of_node, "arm,func-ids", + sizeof(u32)); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + if (!of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "method", &method)) { + if (!strcmp("hvc", method)) { + use_hvc = true; + } else if (!strcmp("smc", method)) { + use_hvc = false; + } else { + dev_warn(dev, "invalid \"method\" property: %s\n", + method); + + return -EINVAL; + } + } + + mbox = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mbox), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!mbox) + return -ENOMEM; + + mbox->num_chans = ret; + mbox->chans = devm_kcalloc(dev, mbox->num_chans, sizeof(*mbox->chans), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!mbox->chans) + return -ENOMEM; + + chan_data = devm_kcalloc(dev, mbox->num_chans, sizeof(*chan_data), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!chan_data) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < mbox->num_chans; i++) { + u32 function_id; + + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(dev->of_node, + "arm,func-ids", i, + &function_id); + if (ret) + return ret; + + chan_data[i].function_id = function_id; + if (use_hvc) + chan_data[i].flags |= ARM_SMC_MBOX_USE_HVC; + mbox->chans[i].con_priv = &chan_data[i]; + } + + mbox->txdone_poll = true; + mbox->txdone_irq = false; + mbox->txpoll_period = 1; + mbox->ops = &arm_smc_mbox_chan_ops; + mbox->dev = dev; + + ret = mbox_controller_register(mbox); + if (ret) + return ret; + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mbox); + dev_info(dev, "ARM SMC mailbox enabled with %d chan%s.\n", + mbox->num_chans, mbox->num_chans == 1 ? "" : "s"); + + return ret; +} + +static int arm_smc_mbox_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct mbox_controller *mbox = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + mbox_controller_unregister(mbox); + return 0; +} + +static const struct of_device_id arm_smc_mbox_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "arm,smc-mbox", }, + {}, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, arm_smc_mbox_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver arm_smc_mbox_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "arm-smc-mbox", + .of_match_table = arm_smc_mbox_of_match, + }, + .probe = arm_smc_mbox_probe, + .remove = arm_smc_mbox_remove, +}; +module_platform_driver(arm_smc_mbox_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic ARM smc mailbox driver"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |