Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Update xl.cfg files for Xen 4.10 support

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/10/17 14:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 12:46:31PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> From 4.10 onwards, the configuration file should use type= in preference to
>> builder/loader.  Leave the older options for legacy compatability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  config/default-hvm.cfg.in | 5 ++++-
>>  config/default-pv.cfg.in  | 5 ++++-
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/config/default-hvm.cfg.in b/config/default-hvm.cfg.in
>> index 0de2546..c410eff 100644
>> --- a/config/default-hvm.cfg.in
>> +++ b/config/default-hvm.cfg.in
>> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
>>  name="test-@@ENV@@-@@NAME@@@@VARIATION@@"
>> -builder="hvm"
>> +
>> +type="hvm"
>> +builder="hvm" # Legacy for before Xen 4.10
> Since this examples are only for >= Xen 4.10, does it really make
> sense to keep the builder option here?
>
> Do we expect people to mix and match example configuration files?

There is only one version of XTF.  It doesn't branch for different
versions of Xen, so needs to support them all.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel