Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/22] xentoolcore, _restrict_all: Introduce new library and implementation

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH 03/22] xentoolcore, _restrict_all: Introduce new 
library and implementation"):
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 07:48:40PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
> > +void xentoolcore__register_active_handle(Xentoolcore__Active_Handle*);
> > +void xentoolcore__deregister_active_handle(Xentoolcore__Active_Handle*);
> 
> Why use two underscores in those function names?

These functions are for use by other Xen libraries only, not by
external callers.

> Is this library supposed to be stable? We only expect this to be tech
> review, right?  I think it is worth explicitly stating that if that's
> the case.

The API/ABI to xentoolcore_restrict_all is intended to be stable.
The internal API may vary.

The head comment of xentoolcore_internal.h says
   * Interfaces of xentoolcore directed internally at other Xen libraries
but I can make this more explicit if you want.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel