[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/22] xentoolcore, _restrict_all: Introduce new library and implementation

Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH 03/22] xentoolcore, _restrict_all: Introduce new 
library and implementation"):
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 07:48:40PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > +void xentoolcore__register_active_handle(Xentoolcore__Active_Handle*);
> > +void xentoolcore__deregister_active_handle(Xentoolcore__Active_Handle*);
> Why use two underscores in those function names?

These functions are for use by other Xen libraries only, not by
external callers.

> Is this library supposed to be stable? We only expect this to be tech
> review, right?  I think it is worth explicitly stating that if that's
> the case.

The API/ABI to xentoolcore_restrict_all is intended to be stable.
The internal API may vary.

The head comment of xentoolcore_internal.h says
   * Interfaces of xentoolcore directed internally at other Xen libraries
but I can make this more explicit if you want.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.