[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 09/15] tools: implement the new libxc get hw info interface
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:14:43AM +0800, Yi Sun wrote: > This patch implements a new libxc get hw info interface and corresponding > data structures. It also changes libxl_psr.c to call this new interface. > > Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: > - split this patch out from a big patch in v1. > (suggested by Wei Liu) > - change 'CAT_INFO' and 'MBA_INFO' to 'CAT' and 'MBA'. > (suggested by Chao Peng) > --- > tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > tools/libxc/xc_psr.c | 46 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > tools/libxl/libxl_psr.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h > index c7710b8..81a6f48 100644 > --- a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h > +++ b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h > @@ -2458,6 +2458,31 @@ enum xc_psr_cat_type { > }; > typedef enum xc_psr_cat_type xc_psr_cat_type; > > +enum xc_psr_feat_type { > + XC_PSR_FEAT_UNKNOWN, > + XC_PSR_FEAT_CAT_L3, > + XC_PSR_FEAT_CAT_L2, > + XC_PSR_FEAT_MBA, > +}; > +typedef enum xc_psr_feat_type xc_psr_feat_type; > + > +struct xc_psr_hw_info { > + union { > + struct { > + uint32_t cos_max; > + uint32_t cbm_len; > + bool cdp_enabled; > + } xc_cat_info; > + > + struct { > + uint32_t cos_max; > + uint32_t thrtl_max; > + bool linear; > + } xc_mba_info; No need for the _info suffix. The type itself already has info in it's name. > + } u; > +}; > +typedef struct xc_psr_hw_info xc_psr_hw_info; > + > int xc_psr_cmt_attach(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid); > int xc_psr_cmt_detach(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid); > int xc_psr_cmt_get_domain_rmid(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, > @@ -2479,9 +2504,8 @@ int xc_psr_cat_set_domain_data(xc_interface *xch, > uint32_t domid, > int xc_psr_cat_get_domain_data(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid, > xc_psr_cat_type type, uint32_t target, > uint64_t *data); > -int xc_psr_cat_get_info(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t socket, unsigned int lvl, > - uint32_t *cos_max, uint32_t *cbm_len, > - bool *cdp_enabled); > +int xc_psr_get_hw_info(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t socket, > + xc_psr_feat_type type, xc_psr_hw_info *hw_info); > > int xc_get_cpu_levelling_caps(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t *caps); > int xc_get_cpu_featureset(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t index, > diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_psr.c b/tools/libxc/xc_psr.c > index 73d05f2..ba412e4 100644 > --- a/tools/libxc/xc_psr.c > +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_psr.c > @@ -323,36 +323,58 @@ int xc_psr_cat_get_domain_data(xc_interface *xch, > uint32_t domid, > return rc; > } > > -int xc_psr_cat_get_info(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t socket, unsigned int lvl, > - uint32_t *cos_max, uint32_t *cbm_len, bool > *cdp_enabled) > +int xc_psr_get_hw_info(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t socket, > + xc_psr_feat_type type, xc_psr_hw_info *hw_info) > { > int rc = -1; > DECLARE_SYSCTL; > > + if ( !hw_info ) > + return rc; You should set errno = EINVAL here. > + > sysctl.cmd = XEN_SYSCTL_psr_alloc_op; > sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.target = socket; > > - switch ( lvl ) > + switch ( type ) > { > - case 2: > + case XC_PSR_FEAT_CAT_L2: > sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.cmd = XEN_SYSCTL_PSR_CAT_get_l2_info; > rc = xc_sysctl(xch, &sysctl); > if ( !rc ) > { > - *cos_max = sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.cat_info.cos_max; > - *cbm_len = sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.cat_info.cbm_len; > - *cdp_enabled = false; > + hw_info->u.xc_cat_info.cos_max = > + sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.cat_info.cos_max; > + hw_info->u.xc_cat_info.cbm_len = > + sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.cat_info.cbm_len; > + hw_info->u.xc_cat_info.cdp_enabled = false; > } > break; > - case 3: > + case XC_PSR_FEAT_CAT_L3: > sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.cmd = XEN_SYSCTL_PSR_CAT_get_l3_info; > rc = xc_sysctl(xch, &sysctl); > if ( !rc ) > { > - *cos_max = sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.cat_info.cos_max; > - *cbm_len = sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.cat_info.cbm_len; > - *cdp_enabled = sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.cat_info.flags & > - XEN_SYSCTL_PSR_CAT_L3_CDP; > + hw_info->u.xc_cat_info.cos_max = > + sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.cat_info.cos_max; > + hw_info->u.xc_cat_info.cbm_len = > + sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.cat_info.cbm_len; > + hw_info->u.xc_cat_info.cdp_enabled = > + sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.cat_info.flags & > + XEN_SYSCTL_PSR_CAT_L3_CDP; > + } > + break; > + case XC_PSR_FEAT_MBA: > + sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.cmd = XEN_SYSCTL_PSR_MBA_get_info; > + rc = xc_sysctl(xch, &sysctl); > + if ( !rc ) > + { > + hw_info->u.xc_mba_info.cos_max = > + sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.mba_info.cos_max; > + hw_info->u.xc_mba_info.thrtl_max = > + sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.mba_info.thrtl_max; > + hw_info->u.xc_mba_info.linear = > + sysctl.u.psr_alloc_op.u.mba_info.flags & > + XEN_SYSCTL_PSR_MBA_LINEAR; > } > break; > default: > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_psr.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_psr.c > index cf368ba..b183305 100644 > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_psr.c > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_psr.c > @@ -361,6 +361,27 @@ int libxl_psr_cat_get_cbm(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid, > return rc; > } > > +static inline xc_psr_feat_type libxl__psr_feat_type_to_libxc_psr_feat_type( No inline please. In any case this is not performance critical code, so let the compiler decide. And the function name could be shorter, maybe: libxl__psr_type_to_libxc_type Or is this going to clash with some other translation function? > + libxl_psr_feat_type type, unsigned int > lvl) > +{ > + xc_psr_feat_type xc_type = XC_PSR_FEAT_UNKNOWN; > + > + switch (type) { > + case LIBXL_PSR_FEAT_TYPE_CAT: > + if (lvl == 3) > + xc_type = XC_PSR_FEAT_CAT_L3; > + if (lvl == 2) > + xc_type = XC_PSR_FEAT_CAT_L2; > + break; > + case LIBXL_PSR_FEAT_TYPE_MBA: > + xc_type = XC_PSR_FEAT_MBA; > + default: > + break; > + } > + > + return xc_type; > +} > + > int libxl_psr_cat_get_info(libxl_ctx *ctx, libxl_psr_cat_info **info, > int *nr, unsigned int lvl) > { > @@ -369,6 +390,8 @@ int libxl_psr_cat_get_info(libxl_ctx *ctx, > libxl_psr_cat_info **info, > int i = 0, socketid, nr_sockets; > libxl_bitmap socketmap; > libxl_psr_cat_info *ptr; > + xc_psr_hw_info hw_info; > + xc_psr_feat_type xc_type; > > libxl_bitmap_init(&socketmap); > > @@ -385,16 +408,23 @@ int libxl_psr_cat_get_info(libxl_ctx *ctx, > libxl_psr_cat_info **info, > goto out; > } > > + xc_type = libxl__psr_feat_type_to_libxc_psr_feat_type( > + LIBXL_PSR_FEAT_TYPE_CAT, lvl); Shouldn't you check that xc_type != XC_PSR_FEAT_UNKNOWN here? Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |