[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 4/6] xsm: flask: change the dummy xsm policy and flask hook for map_gmfn_foregin
>>> On 27.08.17 at 10:36, <blackskygg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c > @@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@ int xenmem_add_to_physmap_one( > return -EINVAL; > } > > - rc = xsm_map_gmfn_foreign(XSM_TARGET, d, od); > + rc = xsm_map_gmfn_foreign(XSM_TARGET, current->domain, d, od); > if ( rc ) > { > rcu_unlock_domain(od); > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c > @@ -2545,7 +2545,7 @@ int p2m_add_foreign(struct domain *tdom, unsigned long > fgfn, > if ( tdom == fdom ) > goto out; > > - rc = xsm_map_gmfn_foreign(XSM_TARGET, tdom, fdom); > + rc = xsm_map_gmfn_foreign(XSM_TARGET, current->domain, tdom, fdom); I continue to dislike the added arguments here, as being pointless to pass. I'm not the maintainer of either of the modified files, so I won't (and can't) veto the change though. > --- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h > +++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h > @@ -525,10 +525,14 @@ static XSM_INLINE int > xsm_remove_from_physmap(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d1, > return xsm_default_action(action, d1, d2); > } > > -static XSM_INLINE int xsm_map_gmfn_foreign(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, > struct domain *t) > +static XSM_INLINE int xsm_map_gmfn_foreign(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *cd, > + struct domain *d, struct domain > *t) > { > + int rc; > XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_TARGET); Missing blank line between declaration and statements. > - return xsm_default_action(action, d, t); > + rc = xsm_default_action(action, cd, d); > + if (rc) return rc; Coding style. In any event, as suggested before the whole thing is easier to write as > + return xsm_default_action(action, cd, t); return xsm_default_action(action, cd, d) ?: xsm_default_action(action, cd, t); anyway imo (suitably split across lines if needed, of course). > --- a/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c > +++ b/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c > @@ -1165,9 +1165,15 @@ static int flask_remove_from_physmap(struct domain > *d1, struct domain *d2) > return domain_has_perm(d1, d2, SECCLASS_MMU, MMU__PHYSMAP); > } > > -static int flask_map_gmfn_foreign(struct domain *d, struct domain *t) > +static int flask_map_gmfn_foreign(struct domain *cd, > + struct domain *d, struct domain *t) > { > - return domain_has_perm(d, t, SECCLASS_MMU, MMU__MAP_READ | > MMU__MAP_WRITE); > + int rc; > + rc = domain_has_perm(cd, d, SECCLASS_MMU, MMU__MAP_READ | > MMU__MAP_WRITE); > + if (rc) return rc; > + rc = domain_has_perm(cd, t, SECCLASS_MMU, MMU__MAP_READ | > MMU__MAP_WRITE); > + if (rc) return rc; > + return domain_has_perm(d, t, SECCLASS_MMU, MMU__SHARE_MEM); > } At least the style problems mentioned above apply here too. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |