[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.10 Development Update
On 8/22/2017 8:44 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 22/08/17 11:22, Yu Zhang wrote:On 8/21/2017 6:15 PM, Julien Grall wrote:Hi Paul, On 21/08/17 11:11, Paul Durrant wrote:-----Original Message----- From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julien Grall Sent: 21 August 2017 11:08 To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: julien.grall@xxxxxxx Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.10 Development Update This email only tracks big items for xen.git tree. Please reply for items you woulk like to see in 4.10 so that people have an idea what is going on and prioritise accordingly. You're welcome to provide description and use cases of the feature you're working on. = Timeline = We now adopt a fixed cut-off date scheme. We will release twice a year. The upcoming 4.10 timeline are as followed: * Last posting date: September 15th, 2017 * Hard code freeze: September 29th, 2017 * RC1: TBD * Release: December 2, 2017 Note that we don't have freeze exception scheme anymore. All patchesthat wish to go into 4.10 must be posted no later than the last postingdate. All patches posted after that date will be automatically queued into next release. RCs will be arranged immediately after freeze. We recently introduced a jira instance to track all the tasks (not only big) for the project. See: https://xenproject.atlassian.net/projects/XEN/issues. Most of the tasks tracked by this e-mail also have a corresponding jira task referred by XEN-N. I have started to include the version number of series associated to each feature. Can each owner send an update on the version number if the series was posted upstream? = Projects = == Hypervisor == * Per-cpu tasklet - XEN-28 - Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk * Add support of rcu_idle_{enter,exit} - XEN-27 - Dario Faggioli === x86 === * Allow ioreq server interface to support XenGT (v7) - XEN-43 - Yu Zhang - Paul DurrantI think this is either done or obsolete now. Not sure which.CCed Yu Zhang to tell which one.Thanks, Julien. This is done now. :)I may have messed up with the update. Was it upstreamed for Xen 4.9 or Xen 4.10? For the former, I will just totally remove it from the update. It was merged in Xen 4.9. We can just remove this from the update. :-) Thanks Yu Cheers, _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |