[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/tlb: Opencode the use of write_cr4() in write_cr3() and flush_area_local()
On 21/08/17 13:46, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 21.08.17 at 13:55, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This avoids unnecessary updates to the stack shadow copy of cr4 during >> critical regions with interrupts disabled. > Hmm, yes - we don't access CR4 in #MC or NMI handling, do we? #MC and NMI are always able to observe stale values whether we update the shadow copy here or not. The entry paths do modify cr4 to re-enable cr4_pv32_mask, but that is all. As we are interrupting Xen context here, we should take the fastpath and leave cr4 unmodified. ~Andrew > >> No change in behaviour. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > with ... > >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/flushtlb.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/flushtlb.c >> @@ -81,9 +81,14 @@ void write_cr3(unsigned long cr3) >> >> hvm_flush_guest_tlbs(); >> >> - write_cr4(cr4 & ~X86_CR4_PGE); >> - asm volatile ( "mov %0, %%cr3" : : "r" (cr3) : "memory" ); >> - write_cr4(cr4); >> + asm volatile ("mov %[npge], %%cr4;" >> + "mov %[cr3], %%cr3;" >> + "mov %[cr4], %%cr4;" >> + :: >> + [npge] "r" (cr4 & ~X86_CR4_PGE), >> + [cr3] "r" (cr3), >> + [cr4] "r" (cr4) >> + : "memory"); > ... blanks added immediately inside the parentheses here and ... > >> @@ -123,9 +128,11 @@ unsigned int flush_area_local(const void *va, unsigned >> int flags) >> >> hvm_flush_guest_tlbs(); >> >> - write_cr4(cr4 & ~X86_CR4_PGE); >> - barrier(); >> - write_cr4(cr4); >> + asm volatile ("mov %[npge], %%cr4;" >> + "mov %[cr4], %%cr4;" >> + :: >> + [npge] "r" (cr4 & ~X86_CR4_PGE), >> + [cr4] "r" (cr4)); > ... here. > > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |