Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 02/12] arm/mem_access: Move PAGE_SHIFT_* macros to lib.h

[Sergej Proskurin <proskurin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jan,


On 07/03/2017 11:13 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 03.07.17 at 10:40, <proskurin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 06/27/2017 02:04 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> Sergej Proskurin <proskurin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 06/27/17 1:52 PM >>>
>>>> The following commits introduce a software guest page table walk
>>>> software implementation that supports varying guest page size
>>>> granularities. This commit moves already existing PAGE_SHIFT_(4K|64K)
>>>> and the new PAGE_SHIFT_16K defines to a common place in xen/lib.h as
>>>> to allow the following commits to use the consolidated defines.
>>> I don't think the PAGE_SHIFT_* should live far away from the other PAGE_*_*
>>> macros derived from them. I'm also not convinced lib.h is a good place.
>> I agree. I can move related PAGE_*_* from xen/iommu.h together with
>> PAGE_SIZE_* macros into a common place. As we already define PAGE_*
>> macros in asm/config.h, I believe it would make sense to extend these by
>> the upper PAGE_*_* macros. What do you think?
>>
>> If you believe asm/config.h is a good place for the upper macros,
> I don't, no: config.h should represent settings only, while here you
> define constants which aren't necessarily properties of the system
> the hypervisor is being built for.
>

Right. Sorry, I additionally forgot that I took the macros away from a
header accessible to other architectures as well.. So asm/config.h is
definitely not the right choice. Alternatively, I thought of
xen/paging.h, however this would generate a cyclic dependency in mm.h.
What do you think about using a new header xen/page.h instead? Unless
you have a better suggestion. Thank you very much in advance.

Cheers,
~Sergej


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel