[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-next] x86/tlb: Don't use locked operations in tlbflush_filter()

To: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 04:08:58 -0600
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 09 May 2017 10:09:04 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

>>> On 08.05.17 at 18:31, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All passed cpumask_t's are context-local and not at risk of concurrent
> updates.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-next] x86/tlb: Don't use locked operations in tlbflush_filter()
  - From: Andrew Cooper

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] x86/ioreq server: Fix XenGT couldn't reboot when XenGT use p2m_ioreq_server p2m_type
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [ARM] Native application design and discussion (I hope)
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-next] x86/tlb: Don't use locked operations in tlbflush_filter()
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/9] mm: Place unscrubbed pages at the end of pagelist
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.