[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-next] x86/tlb: Don't use locked operations in tlbflush_filter()
All passed cpumask_t's are context-local and not at risk of concurrent updates. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> --- CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- xen/include/asm-x86/flushtlb.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/flushtlb.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/flushtlb.h index 8b7adef..aa86ea2 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/flushtlb.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/flushtlb.h @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static inline void tlbflush_filter(cpumask_t *mask, uint32_t page_timestamp) for_each_cpu ( cpu, mask ) if ( !NEED_FLUSH(per_cpu(tlbflush_time, cpu), page_timestamp) ) - cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mask); + __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mask); } void new_tlbflush_clock_period(void); -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |