Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86/pv: Fix bugs with the handling of int80_bounce

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 08.05.17 at 14:23, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Overall, I expect that Xenolinux purposefully never asked for an
> interrupt gate (as Xen would have rejected that in the 32bit case), and
> this point was never considered at all when PVOps was developed, which
> followed Linux's normal expectation that int80 was an interrupt gate.

Yet I have a hard time seeing why 32-bit Linux needs it to be that
way.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel