|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: don't leak PFEC_implict to guests
>>> On 06.04.17 at 16:59, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
>> @@ -269,13 +269,23 @@ static int svm_vmcb_restore(struct vcpu
>> struct vmcb_struct *vmcb = v->arch.hvm_svm.vmcb;
>> struct p2m_domain *p2m = p2m_get_hostp2m(v->domain);
>>
>> - if ( c->pending_valid &&
>> - ((c->pending_type == 1) || (c->pending_type > 6) ||
>> - (c->pending_reserved != 0)) )
>> + if ( c->pending_valid )
>> {
>> - gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Invalid pending event %#"PRIx32".\n",
>> - c->pending_event);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> + if ( (c->pending_type == 1) || (c->pending_type > 6) ||
>
> Shouldn't this be >=5? The only valid types are 0, 2, 3 and 4.
I don't know, I'm only moving this code. Changes to the values
should be a separate patch.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |