[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86: clarify shadow paging Dom0 support

To: "Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:24:57 -0600
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:25:18 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

>>> On 27.03.17 at 16:15, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:58:15PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> 
>> This needs to be inside a #ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING to avoid breaking
>> the build.
>> 
> 
> I just found out there is a similar issue in x86/setup.c and I sent
> a separate patch to fix that.

The situation there is different: What you can't have without
CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING is the identifier used as an lvalue.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86: clarify shadow paging Dom0 support
  - From: Wei Liu
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86: clarify shadow paging Dom0 support
  - From: Andrew Cooper
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86: clarify shadow paging Dom0 support
  - From: Wei Liu

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/setup: enclose opt_dom0_shadow in CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/setup: enclose opt_dom0_shadow in CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86: clarify shadow paging Dom0 support
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/setup: enclose opt_dom0_shadow in CONFIG_SHADOW_PAGING
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.