[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: sched: don't call hooks of the wrong scheduler via VCPU2OP
>>> On 16.03.17 at 22:30, <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- a/xen/common/schedule.c > +++ b/xen/common/schedule.c > @@ -78,7 +78,19 @@ static struct scheduler __read_mostly ops; > : (typeof((opsptr)->fn(opsptr, ##__VA_ARGS__)))0 ) > > #define DOM2OP(_d) (((_d)->cpupool == NULL) ? &ops : > ((_d)->cpupool->sched)) > -#define VCPU2OP(_v) (DOM2OP((_v)->domain)) > +static inline struct scheduler* VCPU2OP(const struct vcpu *v) The * and blank in the return type want to switch positions. > +{ > + struct domain *d = v->domain; > + > + if ( likely(d->cpupool != NULL) ) > + return d->cpupool->sched; > + > + /* v->processor never changes for idle vcpus, so using it here is safe */ > + if ( likely(is_idle_domain(d)) ) > + return per_cpu(scheduler, v->processor); > + else > + return &ops; Having read through the description, I don't think I can conclude why using &ops here is correct (or at least benign). And even if this was explained in the description, I think a brief comment would be rather desirable here (the more that it having been &ops implicitly was wrong before as per the description). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |