[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/7] xen/9pfs: connect to the backend
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 15/03/17 20:23, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Implement functions to handle the xenbus handshake. Upon connection, > > allocate the rings according to the protocol specification. > > > > Initialize a work_struct and a wait_queue. The work_struct will be used > > to schedule work upon receiving an event channel notification from the > > backend. The wait_queue will be used to wait when the ring is full and > > we need to send a new request. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > CC: groug@xxxxxxxx > > CC: boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx > > CC: jgross@xxxxxxxx > > CC: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@xxxxxxxxx> > > CC: Ron Minnich <rminnich@xxxxxxxxxx> > > CC: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@xxxxxxxxxx> > > CC: v9fs-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- > > net/9p/trans_xen.c | 248 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 248 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/net/9p/trans_xen.c b/net/9p/trans_xen.c > > index b1333b2..ada2b0c 100644 > > --- a/net/9p/trans_xen.c > > +++ b/net/9p/trans_xen.c > > static int xen_9pfs_front_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev, > > const struct xenbus_device_id *id) > > { > > + int ret, i; > > + struct xenbus_transaction xbt; > > + struct xen_9pfs_front_priv *priv = NULL; > > + char *versions; > > + unsigned int max_rings, max_ring_order, len; > > + > > + versions = xenbus_read(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend, "versions", &len); > > + if (!len) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + if (strcmp(versions, "1")) { > > + kfree(versions); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + kfree(versions); > > + max_rings = xenbus_read_unsigned(dev->otherend, "max-rings", 0); > > + if (max_rings < XEN_9PFS_NUM_RINGS) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + max_ring_order = xenbus_read_unsigned(dev->otherend, > > "max-ring-page-order", 0); > > + if (max_ring_order < XEN_9PFS_RING_ORDER) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + > > + priv = kzalloc(sizeof(struct xen_9pfs_front_priv), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!priv) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + priv->dev = dev; > > + priv->num_rings = XEN_9PFS_NUM_RINGS; > > + priv->rings = kzalloc(sizeof(struct xen_9pfs_dataring) * > > priv->num_rings, > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!priv->rings) { > > + kfree(priv); > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + } > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rings; i++) { > > + priv->rings[i].priv = priv; > > + ret = xen_9pfs_front_alloc_dataring(dev, &priv->rings[i]); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + goto error; > > + } > > + > > + again: > > + ret = xenbus_transaction_start(&xbt); > > + if (ret) { > > + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, ret, "starting transaction"); > > + goto error; > > + } > > + ret = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "version", "%u", 1); > > + if (ret) > > + goto error_xenbus; > > + ret = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "num-rings", "%u", > > priv->num_rings); > > + if (ret) > > + goto error_xenbus; > > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rings; i++) { > > + char str[16]; > > + > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(XEN_9PFS_NUM_RINGS > 9); > > + sprintf(str, "ring-ref%u", i); > > + ret = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, str, "%d", > > priv->rings[i].ref); > > + if (ret) > > + goto error_xenbus; > > + > > + sprintf(str, "event-channel-%u", i); > > + ret = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, str, "%u", > > priv->rings[i].evtchn); > > + if (ret) > > + goto error_xenbus; > > + } > > + priv->tag = xenbus_read(xbt, dev->nodename, "tag", NULL); > > + if (ret) > > + goto error_xenbus; > > Shouldn't you test priv->tag instead? well spotted, thanks! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |